Your browser is out of date.

You are currently using Internet Explorer 7/8/9, which is not supported by our site. For the best experience, please use one of the latest browsers.

Important Update: 3M Combat Arms Earplugs Litigation

We are no longer accepting new cases in the 3M Combat Arms Earplugs Litigation. However, we understand the significance of this matter and invite you to stay informed about the settlement phase through our blog.

Explore the latest updates and insights on the settlement process in the 3M Combat Arms Earplugs Litigation on our blog.

3M Combat Arms Earplugs Lawsuit Attorney

3M Company manufactured and supplied the United States military with Combat Arms earplugs to protect the service members’ ears from the loud sounds associated with military training and combat. Defects in the earplugs were found to be responsible for significant hearing loss and tinnitus experienced by thousands of soldiers. At Laminack, Pirtle & Martines, our accomplished personal injury and trial attorneys are dedicated to securing compensation for their medical expenses and losses.

Contact Us

Laminack, Pirtle & Martines offer contingency fee arrangements to all of our clients ensuring justice is never hindered by financial constraints.

More Information on the 3M Combat Earplug Lawsuit

Thousands of U.S. service members received 3M Dual-Ended Combat Arms Earplugs while deployed overseas from 2003 to 2015. Instead of safeguarding their hearing, these earplugs, according to military personnel, were defective and contributed to significant hearing issues.

In July 2018, 3M agreed to pay $9.1 million to the U.S. military to settle allegations that it knowingly provided faulty earplugs. Although 3M did not admit wrongdoing in the settlement, the U.S. Government's lawsuit claimed that 3M was aware of the earplugs' shortcomings, including their tendency to loosen slightly, potentially causing hearing damage, and that 3M misrepresented the earplugs' safety.

red flare map over ear

3M Dual Earplug Design

The 3M Dual-Ended Combat Arms earplugs feature plugs on both ends. One end is designed to block all sound, while the other is meant to block loud impulse noises, such as explosions, while still permitting the wearer to hear soft sounds like officer commands. The lawsuit contended that these earplugs were too short and ill-fitting for some users, often coming loose without their knowledge. This inadequate fit left military personnel's ears vulnerable. The U.S. Government claimed that 3M employees knew of these defects as early as 2000.

Driven by Results

Guided by Experience

We are a mass tort litigation firm that believes a group effort is essential to success, both inside and outside the courtroom. Each of our firm's lawyers contributes their unique skills and experience, collectively forming an exceptional team that offers clients a robust network of support and a wealth of expertise.

Contact Us
Learn More About Us

Frequently Asked Questions

Our law firm works on a contingency fee basis, which means we don’t get paid unless you win. We do not require a retainer or charge an hourly fee. Additionally, we cover all of the up-front expenses to pursue your case. If the case is successful, then the attorneys’ fees and expenses are taken out of the settlement or verdict. Contact our team of Texas Texas 3M earplug injury attorneys for a case evaluation.  

We understand lawsuits can be stressful and most people have a strong desire to leave painful experiences in the past. We strive to litigate our cases to get the best possible outcome for our clients, and sometimes that takes time.  We work tirelessly to get the best result as quickly as possible so our clients can move forward to a brighter future. 

Absolutely! We work for you and part of our job is to provide the information you need to feel secure in your decision to pursue your case. As a general rule we send out updates to our clients once a quarter or more frequently depending on the needs of the case. We also strive to respond to client messages as quickly as possible via phone call, email or text message.

Civil litigation settlements are calculated based on a variety of factors and considerations. The specific process for calculating a settlement amount can vary widely depending on the nature of the case, the laws of the jurisdiction, and the unique circumstances of the parties involved. However, here are some common factors and considerations that typically come into play when calculating civil litigation settlements:

  • Damages: The primary factor in calculating a settlement is the extent of the damages suffered by the plaintiff. Damages can be categorized as follows:
    • Compensatory Damages: These are designed to compensate the plaintiff for their losses. They may include medical expenses, property damage, lost wages, pain and suffering, emotional distress, and other quantifiable losses. Calculating these damages often involves gathering evidence and documentation, such as medical bills, pay stubs, and expert opinions.

    • Punitive Damages: In some cases, punitive damages may be available if the defendant's conduct was particularly egregious or malicious. The purpose of punitive damages is to punish the defendant and deter similar behavior in the future. Calculating punitive damages can be more complex and typically requires proving the defendant's conduct was especially reckless or intentional.

  • Liability and Fault: The strength of the plaintiff's case and the likelihood of success at trial can significantly impact the settlement amount. If the plaintiff has a strong case and the defendant is likely to be found liable, the defendant may be more inclined to settle for a higher amount to avoid the uncertainty and potential costs of a trial.

  • Insurance Coverage: If the defendant has insurance that covers the type of claim being pursued, the insurance policy's limits can influence the settlement amount. The insurer may negotiate on behalf of the defendant, and the available coverage can cap the maximum settlement amount.

  • Legal Costs: Parties often consider the costs and expenses associated with continuing litigation when calculating settlement offers. Litigation can be expensive, and both sides may weigh the potential cost savings of settling versus going to trial.

  • Economic Factors: Economic conditions, such as interest rates and inflation, can affect the present value of future damages. Parties may consider the time value of money when negotiating a settlement.

  • Negotiation and Compromise: Settlement negotiations involve give-and-take between the parties. The willingness of both sides to compromise and reach an agreement can play a significant role in the final settlement amount.

  • Precedent and Case Law: Parties may look to similar cases and court decisions in the same jurisdiction as reference points when negotiating settlements. Past settlements and judgments in comparable cases can provide guidance on reasonable settlement amounts.

  • Emotional Factors: Emotional factors, such as the desire to avoid the stress and uncertainty of trial or the desire for closure, can influence settlement decisions.

It's important to note that there is no fixed formula for calculating civil litigation settlements, and each case is unique. Settlement negotiations often involve back-and-forth discussions between the parties and their attorneys, and the final settlement amount is typically reached through mutual agreement. Consulting with an experienced attorney who can assess your specific case and negotiate on your behalf is crucial in achieving a fair and favorable settlement.

have any questions?

Speak With Our Professionals

Consult our experienced attorneys to discuss your options or call 713-292-2750 for any additional assistance

Yes, keep me informed with the latest updates & newsletters.